Comments for Sycamore Taxpayer http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog Demanding Fiscal Responsibility Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:14:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on 3.2 TEACHER SALARY by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/41-teacher-salary/comment-page-1/#comment-153 Administrator Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:14:48 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1189#comment-153 School board OKs staff reductions (The Enquirer February 20, 2010) The Princeton school board Thursday night discussed the district's plan to cut its budget and authorized Superintendent Gary Pack to cut $1 million in administrative wages and benefits by reducing staff. Board members did not settle on who or how many staff would be affected. A salary freeze on administrators went into effect earlier this month. School board OKs staff reductions (The Enquirer February 20, 2010)

The Princeton school board Thursday night discussed the district’s plan to cut its budget and authorized Superintendent Gary Pack to cut $1 million in administrative wages and benefits by reducing staff.

Board members did not settle on who or how many staff would be affected. A salary freeze on administrators went into effect earlier this month.

]]>
Comment on 3.4 HOURLY Wage Rates by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/hourly-wage-rates-and-yearly-step-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Administrator Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:19:43 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/hourly-wage-rates-and-yearly-step-adjustments/#comment-136 The two tier pay schedule began in 1998. The two tier pay schedule began in 1998.

]]>
Comment on 3.2 TEACHER SALARY by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/41-teacher-salary/comment-page-1/#comment-135 Administrator Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:11:39 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1189#comment-135 St. Bernard-Elmwood Place board approved teachers' contract, effective Aug. 1, 2009-July31, 2012, with no salary increase first year, 2 percent increase second and third years. Source: The Enquirer February 21, 2010. St. Bernard-Elmwood Place board approved teachers’ contract, effective Aug. 1, 2009-July31, 2012, with no salary increase first year, 2 percent increase second and third years.
Source: The Enquirer February 21, 2010.

]]>
Comment on 3.4 HOURLY Wage Rates by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/hourly-wage-rates-and-yearly-step-adjustments/comment-page-1/#comment-130 Administrator Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:19:10 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/hourly-wage-rates-and-yearly-step-adjustments/#comment-130 Over Forty Percent of Sycamore Hourly Employees are Paid More Than Market Rate for the Same Job. (Over 50% are paid the market rate) Some Custodians are paid <strong>30% more</strong>, Educational Assistants are paid <strong>24% more</strong>, Secretaries are paid <strong>20% more</strong>, and Bus Drivers are paid <strong>17% more </strong>... Source: Calculated from Sycamore Community School OAPSE listing February, 2010. Over Forty Percent of Sycamore Hourly Employees are Paid More Than Market Rate for the Same Job. (Over 50% are paid the market rate)

Some Custodians are paid 30% more,
Educational Assistants are paid 24% more,
Secretaries are paid 20% more, and
Bus Drivers are paid 17% more

Source: Calculated from Sycamore Community School OAPSE listing February, 2010.

]]>
Comment on 5.0 Latest News by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/latest-news/comment-page-1/#comment-108 Administrator Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:37:59 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1317#comment-108 RESIDENT QUESTIONS LEGALITY OF TAX HIKE By Forrest Sellers, Northeast Suburban Life. January 27, 2010 IH resident Fred Sanborn said a recent millage move by the IH school district is illegal. The move is not legally justified. . Sanborn referred to a section of Ohio’s Revised Code which states, “no tax rate shall be levied above that necessary to produce the revenue needed by the taxing district or political subdivision for the ensuing fiscal year … unless such rate of taxation for the ensuing fiscal year is clearly required.” . Sanborn said, “(There) is no way this district is running out of money,” citing the district’s reserve fund. . The district is expected to have $24 million in the cash reserve fund by June of next year. . “Why didn’t (the district) dig into the reserve instead of passing the inside millage,” said resident Jim Troppman. . Board members gave these reasons: “the district has a proactive financial planning approach”; It has always been a prudent logical effort to have a reserve fund”; With our projections, we could burn through our reserve fund in a short period of time”; Board members also said these decisions are being made to try and avoid exhausting funds and putting an operating levy on the ballot. RESIDENT QUESTIONS LEGALITY OF TAX HIKE
By Forrest Sellers, Northeast Suburban Life. January 27, 2010

IH resident Fred Sanborn said a recent millage move by the IH school district is illegal. The move is not legally justified.
.
Sanborn referred to a section of Ohio’s Revised Code which states, “no tax rate shall be levied above that necessary to produce the revenue needed by the taxing district or political subdivision for the ensuing fiscal year … unless such rate of taxation for the ensuing fiscal year is clearly required.”
.
Sanborn said, “(There) is no way this district is running out of money,” citing the district’s reserve fund.
.
The district is expected to have $24 million in the cash reserve fund by June of next year.
.
“Why didn’t (the district) dig into the reserve instead of passing the inside millage,” said resident Jim Troppman.
.
Board members gave these reasons: “the district has a proactive financial planning approach”; It has always been a prudent logical effort to have a reserve fund”; With our projections, we could burn through our reserve fund in a short period of time”; Board members also said these decisions are being made to try and avoid exhausting funds and putting an operating levy on the ballot.

]]>
Comment on Area LEVYS by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/area-levys/comment-page-1/#comment-107 Administrator Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:29:41 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1966#comment-107 RESIDENT QUESTIONS LEGALITY OF TAX HIKE By Forrest Sellers, Northeast Suburban Life. January 27, 2010 IH resident Fred Sanborn said a recent millage move by the IH school district is illegal. The move is not legally justified. Sanborn referred to a section of Ohio’s Revised Code which states, “no tax rate shall be levied above that necessary to produce the revenue needed by the taxing district or political subdivision for the ensuing fiscal year … unless such rate of taxation for the ensuing fiscal year is clearly required.” Sanborn said, “(There) is no way this district is running out of money,” citing the district’s reserve fund. The district is expected to have $24 million in the cash reserve fund by June of next year, “Why didn’t (the district) dig into the reserve instead of passing the inside millage,” said resident Jim Troppman. Board members gave these reasons: “the district has a proactive financial planning approach”; It has always been a prudent logical effort to have a reserve fund”; With our projections, we could burn through our reserve fund in a short period of time”; Board members also said these decisions are being made to try and avoid exhausting funds and putting an operating levy on the ballot. RESIDENT QUESTIONS LEGALITY OF TAX HIKE
By Forrest Sellers, Northeast Suburban Life. January 27, 2010
IH resident Fred Sanborn said a recent millage move by the IH school district is illegal. The move is not legally justified.
Sanborn referred to a section of Ohio’s Revised Code which states, “no tax rate shall be levied above that necessary to produce the revenue needed by the taxing district or political subdivision for the ensuing fiscal year … unless such rate of taxation for the ensuing fiscal year is clearly required.”
Sanborn said, “(There) is no way this district is running out of money,” citing the district’s reserve fund.
The district is expected to have $24 million in the cash reserve fund by June of next year,
“Why didn’t (the district) dig into the reserve instead of passing the inside millage,” said resident Jim Troppman.
Board members gave these reasons: “the district has a proactive financial planning approach”; It has always been a prudent logical effort to have a reserve fund”; With our projections, we could burn through our reserve fund in a short period of time”; Board members also said these decisions are being made to try and avoid exhausting funds and putting an operating levy on the ballot.

]]>
Comment on 5.1 NEW BOND ISSUE by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/new-bond-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-106 Administrator Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:04:21 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1948#comment-106 The Northeast Suburban Life asked these Jan. 20, 2010 questions regarding the potential bond issue; "What concerns or questions do you have about the bond issue? A this point, are you likely to support it? Why or why not?" GW answered - " I want to know all the facts before I will vote for a bond issue. What are the specific spending proposals? What alternatives were considered? Why don't they use part of the $39 million cash reserve for this work? The state recommends holding 6-7 percent of revenue in reserve. Sycamore has 52 percent in reserve. Why did the schools add 40 fulltime equivalent employees during the last couple years while enrollment was holding steady? Didn't they know of the need for renovations back then? I also want to know the breakdown on the $4.5 million budget increase implemented this year. Where is that taxpayer money going? At this point I would vote against it because I have too many unanswered questions and concerns." The Northeast Suburban Life asked these Jan. 20, 2010 questions regarding the potential bond issue; “What concerns or questions do you have about the bond issue? A this point, are you likely to support it? Why or why not?”

GW answered – ” I want to know all the facts before I will vote for a bond issue. What are the specific spending proposals?
What alternatives were considered? Why don’t they use part of the $39 million cash reserve for this work? The state recommends holding 6-7 percent of revenue in reserve. Sycamore has 52 percent in reserve.
Why did the schools add 40 fulltime equivalent employees during the last couple years while enrollment was holding steady? Didn’t they know of the need for renovations back then?
I also want to know the breakdown on the $4.5 million budget increase implemented this year. Where is that taxpayer money going? At this point I would vote against it because I have too many unanswered questions and concerns.”

]]>
Comment on 3.3 ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES by Administrator http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/93-salary-administrative/comment-page-1/#comment-105 Administrator Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:44 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1257#comment-105 Middletown picks new school chief. MIDDLETOWN - A Kansas educator will become superintendent of Middletown City Schools on April 5. Greg Rasmussen will earn an annual salary of $130,000. Rasmussen is in his fifth year as an assistant superintendent in Wichita schools, the largest district in the state. Rasmussen was one of seven candidates interviewed from a pool of 60 applicants. Enquirer 2/3/2010 SYCAMORE SUPERINTENDENT annual salary is $153,500. Middletown picks new school chief.
MIDDLETOWN – A Kansas educator will become superintendent of Middletown City Schools on April 5.
Greg Rasmussen will earn an annual salary of $130,000.
Rasmussen is in his fifth year as an assistant superintendent in Wichita schools, the largest district in the state.
Rasmussen was one of seven candidates interviewed from a pool of 60 applicants.
Enquirer 2/3/2010

SYCAMORE SUPERINTENDENT annual salary is $153,500.

]]>
Comment on 3.1 STEP RAISE by propertyowner333 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/43-classified-employee-wages/comment-page-1/#comment-51 propertyowner333 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:35:54 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1208#comment-51 Mechanic Hourly Rate Scale Steps 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1 $18.55 $18.95 $19.30 2 $19.13 $19.53 $19.88 3 $19.72 $20.12 $20.47 4 $20.31 $20.71 $21.06 5 $20.90 $21.30 $21.65 6 $21.49 $21.89 $22.24 7 $22.06 $22.46 $22.81 8 $22.65 $23.05 $23.40 9 $22.65 $23.63 $23.98 10 $23.23 $24.22 $24.57 11 $23.82 $24.22 $24.57 12 $23.82 $24.22 $24.57 13 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16 14 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16 15 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16 16 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74 17 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74 18 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74 19 $25.58 $25.98 $26.33 20 $25.58 $25.98 $26.33 Mechanic Hourly Rate Scale
Steps 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
1 $18.55 $18.95 $19.30
2 $19.13 $19.53 $19.88
3 $19.72 $20.12 $20.47
4 $20.31 $20.71 $21.06
5 $20.90 $21.30 $21.65
6 $21.49 $21.89 $22.24
7 $22.06 $22.46 $22.81
8 $22.65 $23.05 $23.40
9 $22.65 $23.63 $23.98
10 $23.23 $24.22 $24.57
11 $23.82 $24.22 $24.57
12 $23.82 $24.22 $24.57
13 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16
14 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16
15 $24.41 $24.81 $25.16
16 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74
17 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74
18 $24.99 $25.39 $25.74
19 $25.58 $25.98 $26.33
20 $25.58 $25.98 $26.33

]]>
Comment on Education Myths Exposed by propertyowner333 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/blog/91-education-myths-exposeosed/comment-page-1/#comment-33 propertyowner333 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:40:14 +0000 http://sycamoretaxpayer.com/?page_id=1012#comment-33 Busing cuts aren't a good way to save dollars, especially after a levy is defeated. That's because a large portion of school busing expenses is now paid by the state after a large contingent of school superintendents meet with state legislators. Busing cuts aren’t a good way to save dollars, especially after a levy is defeated. That’s because a large portion of school busing expenses is now paid by the state after a large contingent of school superintendents meet with state legislators.

]]>